Activate Bitcoin Everlight: Earn 21% APY In BTC Today

The world of digital finance is moving away from simple trading and toward something more useful. Many people are now looking for ways to earn rewards by supporting the systems that make crypto work. Bitcoin Everlight is at the center of this movement. It offers a unique opportunity for users to earn native Bitcoin rewards by activating a validation Shard.

This platform is not just about holding a token. It is about becoming part of the infrastructure that helps Bitcoin grow. By joining early, users can secure a position that offers high rewards while supporting the most secure network on the planet.

Why Investors are Choosing Bitcoin Validation

Earning Bitcoin used to be very hard. You either had to buy it at a high price or run expensive mining rigs. Bitcoin Everlight has created a third way. By using a lightweight validation layer, it allows the network to process payments much faster.

Users who join the network are rewarded for their participation. Instead of getting paid in a new or unknown token, Bitcoin Everlight pays its mainnet rewards in real Bitcoin. This makes it a very attractive option for anyone who wants to build their BTC balance without the stress of daily trading.

How to Earn 21% APY or More

During the current phase, the rewards are designed to be very high to thank early supporters. The system uses a tier-based model. Your reward rate depends on which Shard you choose to activate.

• Azure Shard ($500): This is the starting point and offers a solid reward rate for new users.

• Violet Shard ($1,500): This middle tier offers an increased reward rate of 18% during the presale.

• Radiant Shard ($3,000): This is the top tier and offers 28% APY or more for those who want the highest returns.

For those looking for a balanced entry, achieving an average return of 21% across your holdings is very common. The more you contribute to the network's strength, the more the network rewards your commitment.

Simple 4-Step Activation

You do not need to be a tech expert to start earning. The platform has made the process very easy for everyone to follow.

1. Purchase BTCL: Get your utility tokens during the active presale.

2. Shard Activation: Your Shard turns on automatically based on your total balance.

3. Support the Network: Your active Shard helps route Bitcoin payments globally.

4. Collect BTC: Once the network is live, you earn your share of transaction fees in real Bitcoin.

Bank-Grade Security and Verified Audits

Bitcoin Everlight takes your safety very seriously. The project follows a "Bank-Grade" security model to ensure all user data and funds are protected by international standards. To provide a high level of trust, the system has undergone multiple independent checks.

• ISO/IEC 27001 Certified: The platform meets the global gold standard for information security management.

• Independent Audits: Every smart contract has been 100% audited by SolidProof and SpyWolf to ensure the code is safe.

• Team KYC Verified: The core team has proven their identities through VitalBlock and SpyWolf certificates.

• Operational Safety: The system uses 24/7 on-chain monitoring and multi-sig wallets to prevent any unauthorized access.

The Native Bitcoin Advantage

The biggest reason to look at Bitcoin Everlight is the reward type. While other projects give you their own project tokens, this platform gives you Native BTC. Bitcoin is the strongest and most trusted asset in the crypto world. By earning your rewards in BTC, you are building wealth in a currency that is recognized everywhere. As more businesses and people use the network for fast payments, the rewards for Shard holders can grow even more.

Phase 1 Presale: The 5-Day Countdown

The project is currently in the first stage of its launch. This is a very limited window that offers the lowest entry price for all participants.

• Current Stage: Phase 1

• Token Price: $0.0008

• Window Duration: Six Days Total

• Next Stage Price: $0.0010

There is lees than six days left before the price moves up to $0.0010. By entering during Phase 1, you can activate your chosen Shard tier for the lowest possible cost. This is the best time to maximize your reward potential before the network continues its planned growth.

Conclusion: Start Stacking Bitcoin Now

Bitcoin Everlight has made it simple to earn rewards without needing hardware or deep technical knowledge. With high APY potential and "Bank-Grade" security, it offers a secure path to growing your Bitcoin balance. Whether you are new to crypto or a long-time investor, activating a Shard is a smart way to support the future of Bitcoin payments.

Join Phase 1 and start earning Bitcoin today: https://bitcoineverlight.com/btc-revolution

Disclaimer: This is a sponsored article and is for informational purposes only. It does not reflect the views of Crypto Daily, nor is it intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, or financial advice.

* This article was originally published here

Cere Network CEO Fred Jin and Lime co-founder Brad Bao face second federal lawsuit as crypto fraud claims reach $157 million

Cere Network CEO Fred Jin, described in court filings as the alleged architect of a multi-year cryptocurrency fraud, and Lime co-founder Brad Bao have been named as defendants in a second federal racketeering lawsuit, bringing total claimed damages to $157 million across two separate RICO actions in the Northern District of California.

The new complaint, filed by San Francisco investor Josef Qu (Case No. 3:26-cv-01235), seeks $57 million in damages and brings ten causes of action including RICO, securities fraud under the Securities Exchange Act, and theft. It arrives just weeks after a $100 million suit was filed by investor group Goopal Digital Limited against the same defendants.

A rapid escalation with new legal theories

The first Goopal lawsuit asserted six claims: RICO, RICO conspiracy, fraud, aiding and abetting fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of advisory and token sale agreements. The Qu complaint significantly expands the legal arsenal, adding securities fraud under Section 10(b) and Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, theft, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

The introduction of federal securities fraud claims is significant. Section 10(b) prohibits the use of manipulative or deceptive devices in connection with the purchase or sale of securities. Section 20(a) imposes “control person” liability on individuals who direct entities that violate securities laws, creating a direct legal pathway to hold board members like Bao accountable regardless of whether they personally executed the alleged scheme.

The complaint alleges that Cere Network CEO Fred Jin and his associates made material misrepresentations to investors about how funds would be used, the lockup restrictions on insider tokens, and the financial health of the project.

Blockchain evidence and $16.6 million in DeFi losses

The new complaint goes further than the first lawsuit in its evidentiary specificity. The filing cites specific Etherscan transaction records purporting to show the movement of tokens and funds from Cere Network corporate wallets, providing a forensic-grade paper trail on a public, immutable ledger.

The complaint provides a detailed accounting of approximately $16.6 million that was allegedly lost in high-risk decentralized finance investments made with investor capital: $6.51 million in the Mochi Protocol, $3.27 million in a CVX/ETH liquidity pool, $780,000 in Maple Finance, and $345,000 in the Neutrino USDN protocol. The complaint characterizes these as unauthorized and reckless.

Both lawsuits allege that additional proceeds from the insider sell-off, totaling approximately $41.78 million, were routed through a network of shell companies in Delaware, the British Virgin Islands, Panama, and Germany, and into personal accounts controlled by Jin, his wife Maren Schwarzer, and his brother Xin Jin. The new filing adds that funds were also used to purchase luxury real estate in Germany and Florida.

Gotbit connection draws further DOJ parallels

As detailed in the first lawsuit, both complaints allege that Jin engaged Gotbit Ltd. to deploy automated trading bots that conducted wash trading during the November 2021 token launch, generating fake volume to create the appearance of legitimate market activity while insiders systematically liquidated their positions.

Gotbit’s founder, Aleksei Andryunin, was convicted of wire fraud and market manipulation as part of the DOJ’s Operation Token Mirrors , the same federal sting operation that targeted crypto market-making firms engaged in wash trading. The DOJ has called wash trading“a cornerstone of crypto market manipulation” and has aggressively pursued firms engaged in the practice.

The Qu complaint adds new blockchain detail to this allegation, citing Etherscan evidence showing token movements from corporate wallets to exchange wallets on the first day of trading. The combination of a convicted market maker and on-chain transaction records documenting coordinated token movements strengthens the evidentiary foundation for both civil cases.

Investors who never received a single token

Plaintiff Josef Qu invested in Cere Network through a Simple Agreement for Future Tokens in 2019, which entitled him to 27,777,778 CERE tokens. According to the complaint, Qu never received any of his tokens despite confirmed entitlement and repeated requests, even as insiders allegedly moved their own allocations to exchanges and began selling within hours of the launch.

The first lawsuit’s plaintiffs tell a similar story. Vivian Liu and Goopal Digital claim they were owed a combined 53.3 million tokens and received none. The CERE token reached $0.47 on launch day and now trades at approximately $0.00061, a decline of more than 99.8 percent.

A pattern of ventures: Funler, Bitlearn, Cere, and now CEF AI

The Qu complaint expands on allegations of a repeating pattern. Before Cere Network, Jin allegedly ran a project called Funler, later rebranded as Funler Chain, between 2016 and 2018. The complaint alleges that Funler raised approximately $10 million before its token lost roughly 95 percent of its value. A subsequent venture called Bitlearn, launched in 2018, allegedly followed an identical trajectory.

The complaint further alleges that Jin has since launched a new artificial intelligence venture, CEF AI Inc., funded with proceeds from the alleged Cere Network fraud. The plaintiff is seeking a constructive trust over CEF AI’s assets and injunctive relief to freeze the company’s holdings. If the allegations are substantiated, the implication is that the alleged fraud has not ended. It has merely changed industries.

Fred Jin’s alleged role as architect of the scheme

Both lawsuits identify Jin as the lead defendant and alleged mastermind. The complaints allege Jin personally directed the insider token sell-off on launch day, engaged Gotbit to conduct wash trading, controlled the corporate wallets from which $16.6 million was lost in DeFi investments, and routed proceeds through shell companies in four jurisdictions into accounts held by himself, his wife Maren Schwarzer, and his brother Xin Jin.

The new complaint paints Jin as a serial operator, alleging he ran at least two prior ventures, Funler and Bitlearn, that followed the same playbook before Cere Network, and that he has now launched a new AI venture, CEF AI Inc., with funds allegedly stolen from Cere investors. The plaintiff is seeking to freeze Jin’s cryptocurrency wallets, bank accounts, CEF AI holdings, and luxury real estate in Germany and Florida.

Brad Bao’s alleged role and prior litigation

Bao, who gained prominence as co-founder of the $2.4 billion scooter startup Lime, allegedly served as a board member who lent credibility to the Cere Network project while receiving director’s fees and an early token allocation. Both lawsuits allege he approved transactions that moved funds into accounts controlled by Jin and failed to flag irregularities.

The new complaint adds Section 20(a) “control person” liability, which creates a legal pathway to hold Bao responsible as someone who exercised control over an entity that violated federal securities laws.

Bao and his companies have been involved in prior litigation, including a fraud action involving the City of San Francisco and a lawsuit by venture fund Khosla Ventures alleging fraud and intentional interference over a collapsed $30 million acquisition deal.

Potential regulatory exposure

Two federal RICO lawsuits totaling $157 million, filed within weeks of each other and now including securities fraud claims, create the kind of fact pattern that has historically drawn regulatory scrutiny from federal authorities. The DOJ and SEC have demonstrated a willingness to pursue enforcement actions following escalating civil litigation, particularly in cases involving:

• Securities fraud (tokens sold to U.S. investors under Reg D, with misrepresentations alleged in SAFT agreements)

• Wire fraud (the complaints cite multiple instances of allegedly fraudulent communications to investors)

• Money laundering (both complaints trace funds through shell companies in four jurisdictions and into luxury real estate)

• Market manipulation (the alleged Gotbit arrangement, whose founder was convicted in Operation Token Mirrors)

• Ongoing conduct (the allegation that stolen funds are actively being deployed into a new AI venture)

The SEC has made token offerings a priority enforcement area, and the allegations in the Qu complaint, including material misrepresentations to SAFT investors, insider selling in violation of lockup agreements, and wash trading through a convicted firm, fall squarely within the agency’s mandate. The DOJ’s existing investigative thread through the Gotbit prosecution provides an established pathway for criminal investigators to examine related token launches.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California and the DOJ’s Criminal Division maintain active crypto enforcement units that regularly coordinate with civil plaintiffs’ attorneys and SEC investigators. The cascading nature of the Cere Network litigation, with multiple independent plaintiffs, expanding legal theories, and growing forensic evidence, is the type of pattern that has preceded federal action in prior cases.

Other defendants

In addition to Jin and Bao, both lawsuits name Maren Schwarzer (Jin’s wife), Xin Jin (Jin’s brother), Martijn Broersma (CMO), François Granade (board member), and corporate entities Cerebellum Network Inc., Interdata Network Ltd., and CEF AI Inc.

The new lawsuit is Josef Qu v. Fred Jin et al., Case No. 3:26-cv-01235, with the plaintiff represented by Laith D. Mosely and Joshua C. Williams of Raines Feldman Littrell LLP. The related first lawsuit is Goopal Digital Limited et al. v. Fred Jin et al., Case No. 3:26-cv-00857, with plaintiffs represented by John K. Ly and Jennifer L. Chor of Liang Ly LLP.

Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

* This article was originally published here

SOL Price Stabilizes Around $93, playnance prepare for G Coin TGE tomorrow

Late trading sessions often reveal more than headlines suggest. Price movements slow, yet positioning quietly shifts across the market. Solana has reached that stage, when short-term indications are still split, as long-term expectations keep on building.

With traders now focused on Solana price prediction models to 2026 and beyond, interest is also picking up on future token launches across the broader ecosystem. Among the upcoming events receiving growing attention is the playnance G Coin Token Generation Event, scheduled for March 18.

Solana Price Outlook: Range-Bound with Gradual Upside Potential

Solana is projected to trade between $95 and $138 in 2026. This range reflects moderate growth with controlled volatility. The anticipated average price is around $125, indicating steady expansion rather than rapid acceleration.

Forecast models estimate a potential return of over 40% from current levels. However, this depends on stable network performance and continued application growth. Longer-term projections extend further. With broader adoption and expansion of the ecosystem, Solana has the potential to reach above 200 in 2027.

Still, current sentiment remains cautious. Technical indicators show a mixed outlook, with more bearish signals than bullish ones.

Technical Indicators Show a Balanced but Fragile Market

The short-term moving averages of Solana indicate downward pressure. The 200-day SMA is expected to decline toward $120. Meanwhile, the 50-day SMA may fall near $80. These trends indicate reduced momentum during the current phase.

SOL_1M_graph_TradingView

Momentum indicators, however, tell a different story. The Relative Strength Index is close to 58, which puts Solana in a neutral position. This implies that the asset is neither overbought nor oversold. Meanwhile, the structure is more evident in price levels. The areas of support are located near $92, $88 and $86. Resistance levels stand at $98, $101 and $104.

The short-term trading range is defined by these levels. A breakout above resistance could trigger renewed momentum.

While Solana remains in a defined range, market behavior is evolving. Traders are no longer focused only on price action. Instead, attention is shifting toward platforms that allow direct participation in market outcomes.

playnance Gains Traction Ahead of March 18 G Coin TGE

One of the clearest near-term milestones is the playnance G Coin Token Generation Event (TGE) on March 18. G Coin is not being launched on a dormant platform; the token sits within a live digital entertainment ecosystem that is already processing user activity ahead of launch.

playnance runs on PlayBlock, which is built for fast and gasless interactions. This fundamental design allows users to interact with products seamlessly while activity remains on-chain. The broader consumer layer also includes PlayW3, which connects users to the social gaming side of the ecosystem.

G Coin is the utility token of the playnance ecosystem. It is used across prediction products, gaming activity, trading-style interactions, and settlement flows. The project describes it as the economic layer connecting activity across its network.

The current figures help explain why the TGE is drawing attention. Based on the latest updates from the live tracker, there are already 207,546 holders, the token’s price is $0.001618843, and 13.897 billion G Coin have been sold. The current market cap stands at $39.55 million.

Supply metrics also show how the structure is being managed before launch. Total supply is fixed at 77 billion G Coin. Current circulation supply stands at 24.432 billion, while 3.171 billion tokens are listed as locked supply. The locked treasury total has also climbed to 3,171,742,874 G Coin, with allocations shown across casino, prediction, and trading activity.

Those numbers matter because they frame G Coin as a live utility token rather than a theoretical asset. The project's wider ecosystem supports 10,000+ on-chain games, 2.5 million live sports events annually, and a large volume of prediction and crash-style interactions. It also operates with a broad network that includes 2,000+ live social casino partner platforms, 6,000+ affiliates, and 30+ game studios.

With the TGE now hours away, the market is no longer looking at a concept-stage token. It is looking at a utility token tied to an operating platform with measurable adoption, visible holder growth, and a fixed-supply structure.

More information: 

• Explore Solana in more detail here: https://solana.org/

• Find information about PlayNance and the official token sale here: https://playw3.com/gcoin

Disclaimer: This is a sponsored article and is for informational purposes only. It does not reflect the views of Crypto Daily, nor is it intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, or financial advice.

* This article was originally published here

Move Over Mining — A New Platform Lets Users Earn Bitcoin

Global mining operations now consume energy at nation-state scale. The average cost to produce one Bitcoin has climbed above $100,000 in many models, while price volatility continues to compress margins for operators who cannot secure wholesale power contracts and optimized cooling infrastructure. 

Profitability in 2026 sits squarely at or below $0.06 to $0.07 per kWh with 15 to 16 joules per terahash gear and real uptime — a bar that eliminates the vast majority of participants before they even start. A mining machine alone costs between $2,000 and $20,000, making serious participation difficult for anyone outside professional operations. The window for individual Bitcoin mining has been closing for years. For most people, it is already shut. A platform called Bitcoin Everlight has been building a different path to earning Bitcoin — one that starts at $50 and requires no hardware at all.

The Platform That Changed The Access Model

Bitcoin Everlight runs a decentralized validation network built around a Transaction Validation Node framework — a distributed infrastructure layer that handles transaction validation, routing, and reward distribution across the system. These nodes were already running before the presale opened, and they continue powering the platform today exactly as the technical documentation describes them.

What the V2 update introduced was Everlight Shards — a participation layer that sits above the node infrastructure and makes it accessible to anyone. Before shards existed, connecting to the network meant running nodes directly, which required server management, technical configuration, and ongoing maintenance. Shards removed all of that. When a user's BTCL token balance crosses a defined tier threshold, their shard activates automatically and begins contributing to the validation layer. The node framework does the technical work, while the shard holder holds the position and earns the rewards.

The project has completed dual smart contract audits through Spywolf and Solidproof, and the team has passed KYC verification through both Spywolf and Vital Block. Two independent security firms reviewed the smart contract. Two separate KYC processes confirmed the team.

How Participation Works

Getting from zero to an active shard position follows four steps.

Buy BTCL tokens. Phase 1 is live now with 472,500,000 tokens available at $0.0008 per token. Entry opens from $50 — a figure that stands in sharp contrast to the thousands required just to begin a competitive mining operation today.

Cross an activation threshold. Shards activate automatically the moment the cumulative USD value committed reaches one of three defined tier levels. No separate purchase needed — the token commitment does it.

Hold a live position in the validation layer. The activated shard connects to the Transaction Validation Node network and begins contributing to the infrastructure on its own. The node framework runs independently while the participant earns.

Collect rewards from activation. Fixed BTCL rewards begin accumulating the moment a shard goes live — calculated as stake multiplied by APY multiplied by days active divided by 365, distributed continuously throughout the presale period.

Three Tiers, Three Levels Of Exposure

The shard system currently runs three activation levels, each carrying a different threshold and a fixed APY for the full presale duration.

The Azure Shard activates at $500 and earns 12% APY during the presale period. The Violet Shard activates at $1,500 and earns 18% APY. The Radiant Shard activates at $3,000 and carries the highest fixed rate at 28% APY.

Users building from $50 hold a dormant shard position within the ecosystem — a place that upgrades automatically the moment the balance crosses the next tier. During presale, tokens are locked and commitments are final and non-reversible. Because balances cannot move, shard tiers cannot drop — the tier activated at entry holds for the full presale duration. After mainnet launches, tiers are maintained based on the USD-equivalent BTCL balance held at any given time, adjusting automatically as that balance shifts.

What The Reward Model Looks Like Compared To Mining

Mining in 2026 is no longer a decentralised hobby — it is an industrial infrastructure business dominated by operators with access to wholesale power contracts, optimized cooling architecture, and geopolitical diversification. The participants who cannot meet those requirements are structurally disadvantaged before a single block is found.

Bitcoin Everlight distributes BTC after mainnet — sourced from real transaction routing fees generated by the node network. Active shards earn a proportional share of those fees, with distribution scaling directly alongside network usage. Network volume multiplied by the fee rate, divided across all active shards, determines how much each holder receives. Higher transaction activity generates more fees, and more fees means more Bitcoin flowing to shard holders.

The infrastructure overhead comparison does not need much elaboration. Mining demands industrial capital, ongoing energy costs, and continuous hardware management. A Radiant Shard position on Bitcoin Everlight activates at $3,000 — less than the cost of a single mid-range ASIC miner — with no electricity bill attached to it and no depreciation schedule to worry about.

Post-mainnet tier thresholds are governed through a formal, transparent protocol process, structured to maintain long-term ecosystem balance.

Phase 1 Is Running Now

Bitcoin Everlight is in Phase 1 of its presale. Each phase runs for six days, with 472,500,000 tokens available at $0.0008 per token. Participants who activate shards during this window lock in current pricing, earn fixed APY from the moment of activation, and carry those positions into mainnet — already connected to the validation infrastructure when live BTC distribution begins.

Get started here:

https://bitcoineverlight.com/btc-revolution

Disclaimer: This is a sponsored article and is for informational purposes only. It does not reflect the views of Crypto Daily, nor is it intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, or financial advice.

* This article was originally published here

LBank Ignites 2026 World Cup Spirit with 200,000 USDT Prize Pool and 100% Win Lucky Draw

Singapore, Singapore, March 16th, 2026, Chainwire

LBank, the leading global cryptocurrency exchange, is thrilled to announce the official launch of its 2026 World Cup Celebration, featuring a massive 200,000 USDT prize pool. Starting March 16, the platform will host an exclusive Lucky Draw with a 100% win rate, ensuring that every participant shares in the rewards. By combining heavy-hitting physical prizes with high-value digital assets, LBank aims to deliver the peak passion of the World Cup while offering users an unparalleled trading experience.

The campaign officially begins on March 16, inviting both new and existing users to participate by registering, trading, and inviting friends. Participants can unlock multiple lucky draw chances through platform engagement, with more activity translating into more opportunities to win.

For trading enthusiasts, LBank offers even greater rewards:

• Spot Trading: Users who reach 100 USDT in cumulative spot trading volume will receive one lucky draw chance.
• Futures Trading: Users who achieve 3,000 USDT in cumulative futures trading volume can unlock additional lucky draw chances, with higher trading activity enabling users to earn up to 16 draw opportunities.
• High-Volume Bonus: For professional traders, reaching an accumulated futures volume of 100,000,000 USDT grants an immediate, one-time unlock of 19 additional draw chances.
• Referral Rewards: Successfully invite friends (who complete KYC and deposit 50 USDT) to receive 2 draw chances per referral, accelerating the luck across your social circle.

To honor this premier global event, LBank has curated a massive prize pool that seamlessly blends cutting-edge technology, exclusive stadium access, and top-tier crypto assets into a single, high-stakes ecosystem. Participants stand a chance to win elite physical rewards such as the sleek iPhone 17e, highly coveted 2026 World Cup Tickets, and authentic 2026 Argentina National Team Jerseys, alongside direct distributions of mainstream tokens like BTC, ETH, SOL, and DOGE to instantly boost their portfolios. Furthermore, the prize pool is packed with strategic trading incentives, including Futures Bonuses, Position Vouchers, and Fee Rebate Vouchers, all designed to significantly lower future trading costs and empower users as they navigate the markets.

As global interest in major sporting events continues to grow, LBank aims to bring the excitement of international football to the crypto community through engaging campaigns and rewarding trading experiences. Users can now join the campaign, complete tasks, and maximize their lucky draw chances for a shot at some of the season’s most exciting prizes.

For more information, users can visit the official website of LBank.

About LBank

Founded in 2015, LBank is a leading global cryptocurrency exchange serving over 20 million registered users in 160 countries and regions. With a daily trading volume exceeding $10.5 billion and 10 years of safety with zero security incidents, LBank is dedicated to providing a comprehensive and user-friendly trading experience. Through innovative trading solutions, the platform has enabled users to achieve average returns of over 130% on newly listed assets.

LBank has listed over 300 mainstream coins and more than 50 high-potential gems. Ranked No. 1 in 100x Gems, Highest Gains, and Meme Share, LBank leads the market with the fastest altcoin listings, unmatched liquidity, and industry-first trading guarantees, making it the go-to platform for crypto investors worldwide.

Users Can Follow LBank for Updates:

Website: https://www.lbank.com/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/LBank_Exchange

Telegram: https://t.me/LBank_en

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lbank_exchange

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/lbank

ContactPR & Communications TeamLBankpress@lbank.com

Disclaimer: This is a sponsored press release and is for informational purposes only. It does not reflect the views of Crypto Daily, nor is it intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, or financial advice.

* This article was originally published here

Esports Betting with Cryptocurrency in France: Where Gamers Place BTC and USDT Bets

Esports betting has grown rapidly over the past decade, and cryptocurrency has become an important part of that ecosystem. Competitive gaming tournaments now attract millions of viewers worldwide, with major events for games like Counter-Strike, Dota 2, and League of Legends offering prize pools that rival traditional sports competitions.

At the same time, the rise of crypto payments has transformed how many players place wagers online. Instead of relying on bank transfers or credit cards, bettors can now bet with cryptocurrency using assets such as Bitcoin or USDT. These payments often process much faster than traditional methods, making them particularly appealing for live betting.

For French esports fans, crypto sportsbooks provide access to international betting markets that cover both major tournaments and smaller competitive leagues. Many platforms also offer flexible registration processes and support multiple cryptocurrencies, allowing users to fund their accounts quickly.

This guide explores some of the best esports betting sites with crypto available to players in France. We’ll compare platforms that support BTC and stablecoin wagers, examine esports betting odds, and explain how crypto sportsbooks are changing the esports betting experience.

Best Esports Betting Sites with Crypto for French Players

Several international sportsbooks allow players to place wagers on esports using cryptocurrency. These platforms combine live betting markets, fast crypto withdrawals, and access to major esports tournaments.

Below are five platforms that stand out for esports crypto betting in 2026.

Dexsport — Web3 Esports Betting Platform

Dexsport operates as a decentralized sportsbook and casino platform designed around blockchain transparency and multi-chain cryptocurrency support.

The platform supports more than 40 cryptocurrencies across 20 networks, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, and USDT. Players can register using an email address, Telegram account, or Web3 wallet such as MetaMask or Trust Wallet.

Dexsport offers a broad range of esports markets covering games like:

• Counter-Strike (CS2)

• Dota 2

• League of Legends

• Valorant

Live betting is available on many matches, and the platform includes a Cash Out feature that allows users to settle wagers early during in-play events.

   

Key features include:

• No mandatory KYC verification

• On-chain wager transparency

• Multi-chain crypto deposits and withdrawals

• Combined sportsbook and casino environment

The platform’s welcome offer includes a large deposit bonus and free spins, making it attractive for players exploring best esports betting sites with crypto.

BetPanda — Privacy-Focused Crypto Sportsbook

BetPanda combines a cryptocurrency sportsbook with a casino platform offering slots, table games, and live dealer content.

The platform supports more than 13 cryptocurrencies, including BTC, ETH, XRP, LTC, DOGE, and BNB. Deposits are typically processed quickly, and withdrawals are usually completed soon after approval.

For esports bettors, BetPanda covers several major competitive titles, allowing users to wager on match outcomes, tournament winners, and other markets.

Notable advantages include:

• Flexible verification policies

• Fast blockchain transactions

• Weekly cashback promotions

• Integrated casino and sportsbook platform

While esports markets are not as extensive as those offered by dedicated esports sportsbooks, BetPanda remains a solid option for players looking to bet with crypto on esports tournaments.

Cloudbet — Long-Running Crypto Esports Sportsbook

Cloudbet is one of the oldest cryptocurrency sportsbooks still operating today, originally launched in 2013.

The platform has built a strong reputation among experienced bettors thanks to its deep market coverage and relatively high betting limits. It supports more than 30 cryptocurrencies, including BTC, ETH, USDT, LTC, and DOGE.

Cloudbet’s esports section covers many major competitive games, including:

• Counter-Strike 2

• Dota 2

• League of Legends

• Valorant

Both pre-match and live betting options are available, and the sportsbook offers several advanced markets such as map handicaps and totals.

Because of its strong esports coverage and competitive esports betting odds, Cloudbet is particularly popular among players who bet on tournaments regularly.

BetOnline — Traditional Sportsbook with Crypto Payments

BetOnline is one of the longest-running offshore sportsbooks, originally launched in 2001. While it began as a traditional betting platform, it now accepts both fiat and cryptocurrency payments.

The sportsbook supports several major cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, and USDT. Deposits are processed instantly, while withdrawals are typically completed within hours.

BetOnline offers esports betting markets alongside traditional sports coverage. Players can place wagers on tournaments for games like:

• Counter-Strike

• League of Legends

• Dota 2

The platform also provides features such as:

• early betting lines

• live betting markets

• extensive prop bets

Although its interface feels slightly dated compared to newer crypto sportsbooks, BetOnline remains a reliable option for players seeking a traditional sportsbook experience with crypto payments.

Betplay — Lightning-Fast Crypto Betting

Betplay is a newer crypto sportsbook that focuses heavily on fast payouts and blockchain-based betting.

One of its most notable features is support for the Bitcoin Lightning Network, which allows near-instant BTC transactions. The platform also supports Ethereum and USDT deposits.

Betplay offers esports betting markets alongside traditional sports coverage. Players can place wagers on various esports tournaments and competitions using both pre-match and live betting options.

Highlights include:

• extremely fast crypto withdrawals

• no KYC requirements in most cases

• casino and poker integration

• loyalty and VIP reward programs

These features make Betplay particularly appealing to players who prioritize fast crypto transactions.

Quick Comparison of Crypto Esports Sportsbooks

The table below summarizes key features of the platforms discussed above.

Sportsbook

KYC Policy

Withdrawal Speed

Supported Crypto

Esports Coverage

Key Advantage

Dexsport

No KYC

Minutes

40+

Strong

Web3 transparency

BetPanda

Conditional

Fast

13+

Moderate

Privacy-focused

Cloudbet

Conditional

Minutes–hours

30+

Strong

High limits

BetOnline

Conditional

Hours

Multiple

Strong

Market depth

Betplay

No KYC

Very fast

BTC/ETH/USDT

Strong

Lightning payouts

While each platform supports esports crypto betting, their strengths differ depending on factors such as market depth, withdrawal speed, and privacy policies.

Popular Esports for Crypto Betting

Esports betting markets have expanded significantly as competitive gaming continues to grow. Several games dominate the esports betting scene due to their large tournament ecosystems and global audiences.

The most common titles available across crypto sportsbooks include:

• Counter-Strike 2 (CS2) – one of the most widely bet esports games

• Dota 2 – famous for its International tournament and large prize pools

• League of Legends – major leagues across Europe, Asia, and North America

• Valorant – rapidly growing esports ecosystem

These games often offer a variety of betting markets.

Game

Common Betting Markets

CS2

match winner, map winner

Dota 2

handicap, map totals

LoL

first blood, objectives

Valorant

round handicap

Because esports matches can shift quickly, live betting markets are especially popular among esports bettors.

Esports Betting Odds Explained

Understanding esports betting odds is essential for anyone placing wagers on competitive gaming.

Most crypto sportsbooks display odds in decimal format, which shows the total return for a winning bet. For example, odds of 2.00 mean a successful wager would double the original stake.

Esports betting odds can change rapidly because:

• team performance varies between matches

• roster changes affect predictions

• tournament formats differ significantly

Live betting markets are particularly volatile, as odds adjust constantly based on the match’s progress.

For bettors, comparing esports odds across multiple sportsbooks can help identify more favorable lines before placing a wager.

Why Gamers Prefer Crypto for Esports Betting

Many esports bettors prefer cryptocurrency payments because they simplify transactions and provide greater flexibility.

Common advantages include:

• faster deposits and withdrawals

• lower payment processing delays

• access to international betting platforms

• stablecoin betting options such as USDT

Cryptocurrency transactions also allow users to fund their accounts quickly, which is especially useful for live esports betting.

As crypto adoption continues to grow, more sportsbooks are adding blockchain payment options to attract esports audiences.

Is Crypto Esports Betting Legal in France?

Online gambling in France is regulated by the Autorité Nationale des Jeux (ANJ).

The regulator licenses certain forms of online gambling, including sports betting, poker, and horse racing. However, esports betting does not have a separate regulatory category.

As a result, many French players access international platforms that offer esports betting markets.

A simplified overview of the regulatory situation is shown below.

Topic

France Regulation

Sports betting

Licensed

Esports betting

Not specifically regulated

Crypto payments

Not specifically regulated

Offshore sportsbooks

Commonly used

Players should always check local laws and platform policies before placing wagers.

New Crypto Esports Betting Platforms

The esports betting industry continues to expand as new crypto sportsbooks enter the market.

Many crypto betting platforms now emphasize features such as:

• instant blockchain deposits

• stablecoin betting

• Web3 wallet integration

• automated withdrawals

Competition among sportsbooks has also increased the availability of esports markets, with platforms offering wagers on both major tournaments and smaller regional leagues.

For players, this growth means more opportunities to find competitive esports betting odds and flexible payment options.

Final Verdict

Cryptocurrency is becoming an increasingly important part of the esports betting landscape.

Platforms such as Dexsport, Cloudbet, BetOnline, BetPanda, and Betplay provide a variety of options for players who want to bet with crypto on esports tournaments.

Dexsport stands out for its decentralized infrastructure and transparency, while Cloudbet offers deeper esports markets suited for experienced bettors. BetOnline remains a reliable traditional sportsbook with crypto payments, and Betplay focuses on extremely fast payouts through blockchain networks.

As esports tournaments continue to grow in popularity, esports crypto betting platforms are likely to play an even larger role in the global betting ecosystem.

* This article was originally published here

Blockchain forks explained: impacts and mechanics in 2026

Many crypto enthusiasts believe blockchain upgrades happen smoothly without splitting networks. The reality is strikingly different. Blockchain forks create entirely separate chains with distinct tokens, governance structures, and market values. These splits shape cryptocurrency markets in profound ways, from price volatility to community fragmentation. Understanding fork mechanics helps you anticipate market movements, protect your holdings, and make informed decisions during protocol changes. This guide breaks down what forks are, how hard and soft forks differ, their market impacts, and what developers and investors should watch for in 2026.

Key takeaways

Point Details Fork definition Blockchain forks occur when nodes on the network disagree on the rules governing their shared ledger, creating divergent chains. Hard vs soft forks Hard forks split chains permanently while soft forks maintain backward compatibility with existing nodes. Market impact Forks trigger price volatility, affect network security, and reshape investor trust through governance uncertainty. Token holder effects During hard forks, holders receive duplicate tokens on both chains, creating new investment opportunities and risks. Developer response Teams must choose between maintaining legacy chains or focusing resources on new protocol implementations.

What is a blockchain fork? Foundations and causes

A blockchain fork represents a fundamental split in a decentralized network's consensus rules. When nodes cannot agree on protocol standards, the blockchain diverges into separate paths. This disagreement creates two distinct versions of the ledger, each following different rules from a specific block height forward.

Decentralized consensus forms the backbone of blockchain technology. Unlike centralized systems where a single authority dictates changes, blockchain networks require widespread agreement among validators and miners. When this consensus breaks down, forks emerge as the natural outcome. The distributed nature of blockchain makes unanimous agreement challenging, especially as communities grow and stakeholder interests diverge.

Several factors trigger blockchain forks:

• Protocol upgrades introducing new features or security improvements
• Community disagreements over fundamental network direction
• Governance challenges when stakeholders cannot reconcile competing visions
• Technical bugs requiring immediate patches with controversial solutions
• Economic incentives pushing miners or validators toward different rule sets

These splits reflect competing philosophies within crypto communities. One faction might prioritize decentralization while another emphasizes scalability. When compromise fails, forks allow both visions to coexist as separate projects. The original chain continues for those satisfied with existing rules, while the new chain attracts supporters of proposed changes. Understanding what is blockchain and its impact on crypto helps contextualize why these governance tensions arise naturally in decentralized systems.

Forks create two separate development paths from one project. Each chain maintains its own transaction history from the fork point forward, but shares identical history up to the split. This shared ancestry means token holders on the original chain automatically receive equivalent tokens on the new chain, creating immediate market complexity.

Pro Tip: Watch governance proposal discussions and developer communication channels closely. Rising tension over protocol changes often signals an upcoming fork, giving you time to prepare your holdings and strategy.

Hard forks vs soft forks: key differences and examples

The distinction between hard and soft forks determines whether a blockchain splits permanently or maintains unified operation. Hard forks are backward-incompatible protocol changes, leading to a split in the blockchain and the creation of two separate chains. Nodes running old software cannot validate blocks created under new rules, forcing a permanent divergence. This incompatibility means the network fractures into two separate ecosystems unless all participants upgrade simultaneously.

Conversely, soft forks are backward-compatible protocol changes. Old nodes can still validate new blocks even without upgrading, though they cannot take advantage of new features. The blockchain remains unified because both upgraded and legacy nodes accept the same chain as valid. This compatibility reduces coordination requirements and minimizes disruption.

Feature Hard Fork Soft Fork Compatibility Backward-incompatible, requires all nodes to upgrade Backward-compatible, old nodes still function Chain outcome Creates two separate blockchains Maintains single unified blockchain Coordination Requires community-wide consensus and upgrade Can be deployed by mining majority Risk level Higher risk of community split and confusion Lower risk, smoother transition Reversibility Permanent split unless chains merge later Can be reversed if majority stops enforcing

Hard forks carry distinct advantages and disadvantages:

• Advantages: Enable radical protocol improvements, allow incompatible communities to separate peacefully, create new tokens with distinct value propositions
• Disadvantages: Fragment network effects, confuse users about which chain is legitimate, reduce overall security if mining power splits

Soft forks present their own tradeoffs:

• Advantages: Preserve network unity, minimize user disruption, maintain stronger network effects
• Disadvantages: Limit scope of possible improvements, can marginalize non-upgrading nodes, may centralize control with upgraded majority

The Bitcoin Cash fork of 2017 exemplifies a contentious hard fork. Disagreements over block size limits split the Bitcoin community. One faction wanted to maintain 1MB blocks to preserve decentralization, while another pushed for 8MB blocks to improve transaction throughput. Neither side could convince the other, resulting in a permanent split. Bitcoin continued with smaller blocks while Bitcoin Cash pursued larger blocks and lower fees. Both chains survived with separate communities, development teams, and market valuations. The bnbs long-term outlook after hardfork demonstrates how successful hard forks can strengthen rather than weaken projects when executed with clear purpose.

Pro Tip: Hard forks typically signal consensus failure within a community. Expect significant market volatility around fork dates as traders speculate on which chain will dominate. Position sizing becomes critical during these uncertain periods.

How forks impact cryptocurrency markets and users

Forks reshape cryptocurrency markets through multiple channels, affecting security, prices, and investor psychology. Network security may decline when a fork splits mining power or validator stake between competing chains. Forks affect network security, market stability, user trust, token value, governance, and developer strategy. A divided community weakens the consensus mechanism that protects against attacks. If 60% of miners support one chain and 40% another, both networks become more vulnerable than the unified original.

Token price volatility intensifies around fork events. Uncertainty about which chain will succeed creates speculation and rapid price swings. Traders attempt to profit from anticipated outcomes, while long-term holders face difficult decisions about supporting one chain or both. The emergence of two tokens from one holding complicates valuation models and portfolio management.

User trust suffers when forks occur unexpectedly or without clear communication. Investors question whether their chosen blockchain can maintain stability. Governance complexity increases as communities must coordinate across fragmented stakeholder groups. Each chain requires separate development resources, marketing efforts, and exchange listings. This fragmentation dilutes network effects that made the original project valuable.

Cryptocurrency Price 30 Days Before Fork Price at Fork Price 30 Days After Fork Volatility Change Bitcoin (BCH fork 2017) $2,700 $2,430 $4,200 +85% Ethereum (DAO fork 2016) $12 $11 $8 +120% Bitcoin Cash (BSV fork 2018) $420 $290 $110 +95%

Market reactions vary based on fork circumstances. Planned upgrades with broad support cause minimal disruption. Contentious splits trigger extreme volatility as markets price competing scenarios. The data shows forks consistently increase short-term price swings regardless of long-term outcomes.

"When a blockchain forks, markets face dual uncertainty: which chain inherits the original's value proposition, and whether both chains can sustain independent ecosystems. This uncertainty manifests as heightened volatility until dominance patterns emerge or both chains establish distinct identities."

Investors should consider these market impacts:

• Liquidity fragmentation across multiple chains reduces trading efficiency
• Exchange support determines which forked tokens gain market access
• Developer commitment signals long-term viability of competing chains
• Community size and engagement predict network effect sustainability
• Mining or staking economics influence security and transaction processing

Understanding bitcoin portfolio growth and stability helps frame fork risks within broader investment strategies. The bitcoin cash price action after fork illustrates how markets eventually stabilize as one chain establishes dominance or both find sustainable niches.

Forks test whether blockchain networks can evolve while preserving core values. Markets punish poorly executed forks but reward those that genuinely improve protocols or resolve irreconcilable differences. Your ability to navigate fork events depends on understanding these dynamics before they unfold.

Developer strategies and governance after a fork

Blockchain developers face critical strategic decisions when forks split their communities. Teams must allocate limited resources between maintaining legacy chains and advancing new implementations. Some projects assign separate development teams to each chain, while others concentrate efforts on the version they believe has stronger fundamentals. This resource allocation directly impacts long-term chain viability and feature development pace.

Governance structures require immediate adaptation following forks. The original governance framework may not translate cleanly to new chains with different stakeholder compositions. Communities must establish new decision-making processes, voting mechanisms, and leadership structures. Token distribution becomes contentious as holders debate whether to honor original allocations or implement new models that reflect post-fork realities.

Projects typically follow these steps after experiencing a fork:

1. Assess community sentiment and stakeholder alignment on each chain
2. Establish clear communication channels for each chain's development roadmap
3. Secure exchange listings and wallet support for new tokens
4. Implement replay protection to prevent transaction confusion across chains
5. Define distinct branding and messaging to differentiate competing versions
6. Recruit dedicated development teams and secure funding for ongoing work
7. Build governance frameworks appropriate for each chain's community values

Token launch complexities multiply during forks. Unlike standard token launches where teams control initial distribution, fork tokens appear automatically in existing holder wallets. This creates immediate market supply without the typical vesting schedules or strategic allocation planning. Exchanges must decide which chain deserves the original ticker symbol, often sparking heated debates. Marketing becomes challenging as projects compete for mindshare while sharing historical identity.

Developers navigate technical challenges beyond governance. Replay attacks allow transactions on one chain to be maliciously duplicated on another unless proper protections exist. Chain ID modifications and transaction format changes help prevent this, but require coordination and testing. Network upgrades become more complex as each chain pursues independent development paths that may conflict with future reconciliation attempts.

Learning how to launch a token in 2026 provides context for the unique challenges fork tokens present compared to greenfield launches. Staying informed through resources like crypto trends expert strategies helps developers anticipate governance patterns emerging across the industry.

Successful post-fork development requires clear vision differentiation. Chains that merely replicate their predecessor without distinct value propositions struggle to maintain relevance. The most successful forks articulate specific philosophical or technical differences that justify independent existence. Ethereum Classic's commitment to immutability versus Ethereum's pragmatic governance represents this kind of meaningful differentiation.

Pro Tip: Engage actively in governance forums and developer calls during fork discussions. Your input shapes protocol direction and demonstrates commitment to community-driven development. Early participation also positions you to understand technical roadmaps before markets price them in.

Explore more crypto insights and updates at Crypto Daily

Understanding blockchain forks represents just one piece of navigating cryptocurrency markets successfully. The crypto landscape evolves rapidly with new protocols, regulatory developments, and market dynamics emerging constantly. Staying informed requires access to timely analysis and expert perspectives that cut through noise.

Crypto Daily delivers comprehensive coverage of blockchain technology, market movements, and strategic insights for investors at all experience levels. Our platform bridges the gap between technical developments and practical investment implications, helping you make informed decisions in volatile markets.

Whether you're tracking potential forks, analyzing crypto trends expert strategies, or building foundational knowledge through smart cryptocurrency tips for beginners, our editorial team provides the context you need. Visit Crypto news and blockchain updates regularly to stay ahead of market-moving events and deepen your understanding of this transformative technology.

Frequently asked questions

What happens to token holders after a hard fork?

Token holders automatically receive equivalent amounts on both chains when a hard fork occurs. If you held 10 tokens before the split, you'll have 10 tokens on the original chain and 10 on the new chain. However, these tokens may have vastly different market values depending on exchange support, developer commitment, and community adoption. You'll need compatible wallets to access tokens on both chains, and should verify which chain each wallet supports before attempting transactions.

Can a soft fork turn into a hard fork?

Soft forks maintain compatibility initially but can escalate into hard forks if disagreements intensify. When a soft fork fails to achieve intended goals or creates unintended consequences, opposing factions may push for incompatible changes. Consensus failure during soft fork deployment sometimes reveals deeper philosophical divisions that cannot be resolved through compatible upgrades. If enough stakeholders reject the soft fork direction, they may implement hard fork changes that permanently split the network.

How do forks influence cryptocurrency price volatility?

Forks consistently increase short-term price volatility as markets struggle to value competing chains and predict outcomes. Uncertainty about which chain will dominate, how mining power will split, and whether both chains can survive creates speculation and rapid price swings. Traders attempt to profit from anticipated scenarios while long-term holders face difficult allocation decisions. Volatility typically peaks around the fork date and gradually decreases as one chain establishes clear dominance or both chains find sustainable niches with distinct communities.

What should investors do to prepare for upcoming forks?

Stay informed about proposed protocol changes by following official project communications and developer discussions. Monitor governance forums for signals about community consensus or emerging divisions that might trigger contentious forks. Assess your risk tolerance before the fork date, as volatility typically spikes during these events. Use secure wallets where you control private keys rather than leaving funds on exchanges, ensuring access to tokens on all resulting chains. Follow official project channels exclusively to avoid scam tokens claiming association with legitimate forks.

Recommended

• BNB’s Long-Term Outlook Strengthens After Fermi Hardfork - Crypto Daily
• Crypto regulations 2026: insights for pros. - Crypto Daily
• Bitcoin Price Drivers: What Influences 2026 Markets - Crypto Daily
• BITmarkets Releases Crypto Outlook for 2026 - Crypto Daily

Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

* This article was originally published here