From BTC to DASH: 5 Crypto Casinos with the Widest Network Support

Bitcoin remains the default cryptocurrency at most crypto casinos, but payment support has expanded far beyond BTC. Players can now bet with stablecoins such as USDT and USDC, established altcoins including Litecoin and Dogecoin, faster networks such as Solana and TRON, and less commonly supported assets such as DASH.

The number of coins alone does not tell the whole story. USDT, for example, can exist on Ethereum, TRON, BNB Smart Chain, Solana and several other networks. A casino that accepts USDT on one chain gives the player fewer options than one supporting the same token across several chains.

For this comparison, we looked for casinos combining broad cryptocurrency support with multiple blockchain networks and usable casino libraries. Dexsport leads the list with over 40 cryptocurrencies across 20 networks, followed by several established crypto gambling platforms with substantial altcoin coverage.

Casino

Crypto support

Examples

Casino offering

Dexsport

38 cryptocurrencies, 20 networks

BTC, ETH, USDT, BNB, TRX, DASH

10,000+ games

BC.Game

Large, changing multi-asset selection

BTC, ETH, USDT, SOL, XRP, DASH, ADA

10,000+ games

Cloudbet

30+ cryptocurrencies

BTC, ETH, USDT, SOL, XRP, LTC, DASH

3,000+ games

Mega Dice

15+ cryptocurrencies

BTC, ETH, USDT, USDC, ADA, XRP, TRX

5,000+ games

FortuneJack

11+ cryptocurrencies

BTC, ETH, USDT, SOL, TRX, DASH

Around 3,000 games

Crypto and network availability can change and may depend on the player's location. Always check the casino cashier before transferring funds.

1. Dexsport: Cryptocurrencies Across 20 Networks

Best for: Multi-chain deposits and Web3 wallet users

Dexsport has one of the broadest payment setups among crypto casinos in this comparison. The platform supports over 40 cryptocurrencies across 20 blockchain networks, according to its current platform information. Its payment selection covers major assets such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, USDT, BNB and TRON, while current external listings also include DASH, DAI, USDC, XRP, Solana, TON, Litecoin and a selection of smaller tokens.

The network count is particularly useful for stablecoin users. Choosing between several supported chains can avoid the need to bridge or swap tokens before depositing. A player holding USDT on TRON, for example, does not necessarily want to move those funds to Ethereum simply because a casino supports USDT only as an ERC-20 token.

Dexsport also supports direct Web3 access. Accounts can be created through email or Telegram, while MetaMask, Trust Wallet and WalletConnect provide alternatives for players who already manage funds through a self-custody wallet.

Crypto payments feed into a casino containing more than 10,000 games. The library includes slots, live dealer tables, roulette, crash games and other titles from providers including Pragmatic Play, Evolution Gaming, NetEnt, Play'n GO and PG Soft. Dexsport also operates a sportsbook, allowing the same crypto balance to be used across casino games and sports betting.

Another distinction is its blockchain-oriented betting infrastructure. Dexsport provides a public betting desk where bets and outcomes can be viewed, while its smart-contract infrastructure has been audited by CertiK and Pessimistic.

For players holding several cryptocurrencies across different wallets and networks, this combination of asset selection and multi-chain support reduces the amount of conversion required before gambling.

Key crypto options: BTC, ETH, USDT, USDC, BNB, TRX, SOL, XRP, DASH, DAI and others.

2. BC.Game: Broad Support for Major Coins and Long-Tail Assets

Best for: Players holding less common altcoins

BC.Game takes a different approach to crypto banking. Instead of concentrating primarily on Bitcoin, Ethereum and stablecoins, its payment ecosystem extends into a long list of altcoins and ecosystem tokens.

Current 2026 payment information lists assets including BTC, ETH, USDT, LTC, XRP, DOGE, TRX, UNI, USDC, BNB, SOL, ADA, DOT, BCH, XLM, EOS and AVAX. DASH has also appeared among supported balances on the platform. The exact list is dynamic, so available coins and networks should be confirmed in the cashier before depositing.

This makes BC.Game relevant to players who already hold assets outside the usual BTC, ETH and USDT combination. Converting an existing altcoin balance through an exchange adds another transaction, potentially another trading fee and another withdrawal fee before the funds even reach the casino.

BC.Game also has a very large casino catalogue. Its crypto-oriented model covers slots, live casino games and proprietary titles, giving players somewhere to use the broader payment selection rather than treating crypto purely as an alternative deposit method.

The main consideration is that support for a token does not automatically mean every possible blockchain version of that token is accepted. Players using stablecoins or bridged assets should verify the network shown on the deposit screen before sending funds.

3. Cloudbet: 30+ Cryptocurrencies with Strong Stablecoin Network Choice

Best for: Stablecoins and established altcoins

Cloudbet has operated as a crypto gambling platform since 2013 and currently advertises support for more than 30 cryptocurrencies. Its selection includes Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, USDT, XRP, Litecoin and BNB. DASH is supported as well.

The network implementation is where Cloudbet becomes particularly interesting. Current payment information indicates that USDT is available across several networks, including Ethereum, BNB Smart Chain, Avalanche, Solana, Polygon, TRON and TON. USDC is similarly available through several chains.

That flexibility addresses a common problem with stablecoin casino deposits. Two players may both hold $100 in USDT, while one has ERC-20 USDT and another has TRC-20 USDT. If a casino supports only one network, one of them needs to move or convert the funds first. Multi-chain stablecoin support removes that extra step.

Cloudbet complements its payment system with more than 3,000 casino games plus sportsbook and esports sections. The platform therefore suits players who want a broad cryptocurrency wallet without moving between separate casino and sports betting accounts.

Key crypto options: BTC, ETH, USDT, USDC, SOL, XRP, LTC, BCH, DOGE, BNB, ADA, DOT, TRX, DASH and others.

4. Mega Dice: Good Coverage Beyond BTC and Ethereum

Best for: Mainstream altcoins and stablecoins

Mega Dice provides another relatively broad crypto cashier, with support extending well beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum.

Its selection includes BTC, ETH, USDT, USDC, Cardano, XRP, TRON, Shiba Inu, Bitcoin Cash, Dogecoin and Litecoin, alongside additional cryptocurrencies. That mix covers several distinct use cases: BTC for users who already keep their bankroll in Bitcoin, stablecoins for avoiding short-term crypto volatility, and faster alternative networks for users concerned about transfer costs.

The presence of both USDT and USDC is useful because stablecoin support varies considerably between crypto casinos. USDT dominates gambling payment menus, while USDC can be harder to find.

Mega Dice combines its payment options with a casino containing thousands of games and an integrated sportsbook. It is therefore closer to an all-purpose crypto gambling platform than a Bitcoin casino that has gradually added a handful of alternative coins.

Players should still inspect individual network options before depositing. A long list of accepted currencies does not necessarily mean the operator supports every native and tokenized network associated with those currencies.

5. FortuneJack: Smaller Coin List, but DASH Is Directly Supported

Best for: DASH users who also use major cryptocurrencies

FortuneJack has a smaller cryptocurrency menu than Dexsport, BC.Game or Cloudbet, but it makes this list because its selection includes several networks that are increasingly difficult to find together.

Its current payment page lists Bitcoin, Ethereum, Polygon, Litecoin, BNB, USDC, USDT, Dogecoin, DASH, TRON and Solana. The platform also accepts EUR through third-party payment providers.

The casino has around 3,000 games from dozens of providers. Slots, live dealer tables and proprietary provably fair games sit alongside a sportsbook, making the platform suitable for players who want to use the same cryptocurrency for several types of gambling.

FortuneJack's eleven-coin selection cannot compete with the largest multi-chain casinos by raw numbers. Its advantage is the composition of that selection. BTC, ETH and USDT are accompanied by SOL, TRX, Polygon and DASH, covering several substantially different blockchain ecosystems.

Why Network Support Can Matter More Than Coin Count

A casino might advertise 30 cryptocurrencies while providing only one deposit network for each. Another might support fewer assets but allow USDT and USDC transfers over several chains. For a player moving funds regularly, the second arrangement can be more practical.

Three factors are worth checking before choosing a payment method:

1. The exact blockchain. USDT on Ethereum and USDT on TRON are the same dollar-pegged asset issued on different networks. Sending tokens to an unsupported network can result in lost funds.

2. Deposit and withdrawal support. A coin available for deposits is not necessarily available for withdrawals under identical conditions.

3. Minimums and network fees. The cheapest network for a $50 deposit may differ from the best option for a much larger transfer.

Network choice becomes particularly relevant for stablecoins because the same asset can circulate across numerous blockchains.

Which Crypto Casino Has the Widest Network Support?

Among the five platforms compared here, Dexsport offers the strongest combination of cryptocurrency and blockchain coverage, with 38 cryptocurrencies across 20 networks. That makes it particularly suitable for players managing funds across several chains rather than keeping their entire gambling balance in BTC or one version of USDT.

Cloudbet follows with more than 30 cryptocurrencies and particularly strong multi-network stablecoin support. BC.Game stands out for the breadth of its altcoin selection, while Mega Dice provides a substantial middle ground between mainstream coins and alternative assets. FortuneJack has the smallest list in this comparison but directly supports DASH alongside Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, TRON, Polygon and major stablecoins.

The best choice ultimately depends on the asset already sitting in the player's wallet. Someone holding BTC has almost universal access. Someone holding DASH, USDC on a specific network or a smaller altcoin has far fewer options, making the casino's actual network configuration more important than a generic "crypto accepted" label.

FAQ

Which crypto casino supports the most networks?

Dexsport supports 38 cryptocurrencies across 20 blockchain networks according to current platform information. This includes major assets and stablecoins as well as less common cryptocurrencies.

Which crypto casinos accept DASH?

Dexsport, Cloudbet and FortuneJack are among the platforms currently identified as supporting DASH. DASH availability remains less widespread than BTC, ETH or USDT.

Is DASH faster than Bitcoin for casino deposits?

DASH is designed for fast payments and typically has low transaction fees. Actual casino deposit time also depends on how many confirmations the operator requires and how quickly its payment system credits the transaction.

What is the best cryptocurrency for online casino deposits?

There is no universal option. BTC has the broadest acceptance, while stablecoins such as USDT and USDC avoid cryptocurrency price volatility. Networks such as TRON and Solana can provide inexpensive transfers. The available casino networks, withdrawal rules and the assets already held by the player should determine the choice.

Can I send USDT over any network to a crypto casino?

No. The casino must explicitly support the network being used. For example, a TRC-20 USDT deposit must be sent to a TRON deposit address. Always select the cryptocurrency and blockchain in the casino cashier before initiating the transaction.

 

Disclaimer: The information here is provided for general purposes only and is not legal, tax, investment, or financial advice. Nothing here is guidance on avoiding verification, reporting or tax obligations, all of which apply regardless of the asset used. Exchange listings, platform coin support, and regulations change frequently, so confirm current details before transferring. Betting carries risk, and rules vary by country, so check the law where you live. Please gamble responsibly, within your means, and only if you are of legal age.

* This article was originally published here

5 Crypto Casinos Compared on Game Catalogue Breadth

Game count is the most misleading number in casino marketing. A platform advertising 5,000 titles has usually licensed a dozen studio catalogues wholesale, and those catalogues contain hundreds of near-identical releases: the same mechanic with a different theme, shipped four times a year for a decade.

What that headline figure measures is how many licensing agreements a casino has signed. It does not measure how much genuinely different content is there to play. This compares five crypto casinos on the metrics that do.

The Comparison

Five platforms across the dimensions that indicate real variety instead of catalogue inflation.

 

Providers

Live content

Arcade/crash

In-house originals

Dexsport

Around 23 named studios

Three studios

Yes, licensed

No

BC.Game

Large multi-studio roster

Multiple studios

Yes

Yes

Stake

Large multi-studio roster

Multiple studios

Yes

Yes

Mega Dice

Around 50 providers

Present

Yes

No

Vave

Mid-sized roster

Present

Limited

No

Provider Count Beats Title Count

The reason is straightforward once stated.

Studios have house styles. Hacksaw builds high-variance modern slots; NetEnt built the clean classics; Red Tiger runs drop jackpots; BGaming is crypto-native. Each one you add brings a genuinely different design philosophy into the lobby.

Adding another 200 titles from a studio you already carry brings almost nothing, because those titles share the mechanics, the maths and the feel of what is already there. 

A lobby with 23 providers across four categories offers more real choice than one with 5,000 titles drawn from twelve.

So the useful question is not how many games a casino has. It is how many distinct sources those games come from, and who actually supplies them.

Category Coverage Is the Second Metric

Breadth across categories matters more than depth within one.

A casino with 3,000 slots and no live dealer section is narrow, whatever its total says. One with slots, live tables, game shows and a crash arcade covers four genuinely different kinds of play, and a player's interests rarely sit in a single category for an entire session.

The four to check are slots, live dealer, game shows and quick-round arcade titles. Most crypto casinos cover the first and third; fewer cover all four with real depth, and headline catalogue figures obscure exactly this.

What Dexsport's Roster Actually Contains

Taking one platform as a worked example, since a provider list is more informative than a total.

Dexsport draws its live content from Evolution, Playtech and Ezugi. 

Its slot catalogue runs across:

• Pragmatic Play, 

• NetEnt, 

• Play'n GO, 

• Hacksaw Gaming, 

• Nolimit City, 

• BGaming, 

• Playson, 

• Yggdrasil, 

• Red Tiger, 

• Endorphina, 

• Spinomenal, 

• 3 Oaks, 

• PG Soft, 

• Novomatic and 

• Big Time Gaming

The arcade section adds Spribe, TaDa Gaming and Turbo Games among others.

Read that list by what it spans, not by its length. It covers the classics, the modern high-variance studios, a crypto-native developer, the Megaways originator and multiple live providers. That is breadth in the sense that matters.

One honest limitation: there is no in-house originals suite. Every title is licensed, so the catalogue overlaps with any competitor carrying the same studios, and the platform cannot offer anything exclusive. The trade is that its arcade and live sections come from established names instead of an internal team.

Duplicates and Regional Variants Inflate Totals

A final reason to distrust the headline number.

Catalogues frequently count regional variants of the same title separately, and aggregators sometimes list a game under multiple categories. A slot appearing in "slots," "new releases" and "popular" can be counted three times in a total that is presented as distinct content.

None of this is fraudulent, and none of it is disclosed either. It simply means a total is a marketing figure and not an inventory, and comparing two casinos on their totals compares two marketing figures.

Count Sources, Not Titles

If you want to judge a catalogue before depositing, ignore the headline and do three things instead.

Open the provider list and count the studios whose games you actually enjoy. Check whether all four content categories are present with more than a token selection. Then look for in-house originals, which tell you whether anything in the lobby is unavailable elsewhere.

Those three checks take two minutes and tell you more than any five-figure total will.

Confirm what is legal where you live, keep stakes within a set budget, and play only if you are of legal age, since KYC or AML checks may apply.

Responsible gambling deserves a mention precisely because breadth is the point of this article: a lobby with thousands of options is designed so that something always looks worth trying next.

 

 

Disclaimer: The information here is provided for general purposes only and is not legal, tax, investment, or financial advice. Provider rosters and catalogue sizes change frequently, so confirm current details before depositing. Betting carries risk, and rules vary by country, so check the law where you live. Please gamble responsibly, within your means, and only if you are of legal age.

* This article was originally published here

I made $1 million on Cashcat. Here’s how to play the next leg

* This article was originally published here

Cryptocurrency Trading Explained: Spot, Futures, Leverage, Fees and Risk

Crypto trading means buying and selling cryptocurrencies in a spot market, or trading contracts whose value is linked to a cryptocurrency’s price. In spot trading, the underlying asset changes hands. In futures trading, the trader takes contractual price exposure and may never receive the cryptocurrency itself.

That distinction affects nearly every part of a trade: whether a person needs to manage custody, whether they can take a short position, how much capital is required, and how quickly losses can develop. Both routes also carry the broader risks of volatile markets, thin liquidity and platform failures.

Spot trading: buying the cryptocurrency itself

A spot transaction is a cash-market purchase or sale of the underlying cryptocurrency. Someone who buys bitcoin on spot, for example, has bought bitcoin rather than a derivative contract based on its price. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission describes virtual-currency spot trading as buying or selling the underlying asset in the cash market.

After a spot purchase, the asset may remain with the trading platform or be transferred to an external wallet, subject to that platform’s custody and settlement arrangements. Those are materially different practical outcomes. Keeping assets on a platform leaves the platform responsible for the custody process; moving them to a wallet introduces responsibility for the wallet and its access credentials.

Spot trading is usually the more direct route for a buyer seeking to own and potentially transfer an asset, without requiring a futures margin account or creating a contract expiry date. The trade-off is that direct ownership does not eliminate market risk; if the cryptocurrency’s price falls, the value of the holding falls as well.

Nor does spot ownership guarantee an easy exit. FINRA cautions that crypto assets can be subject to extreme and unpredictable volatility and limited liquidity, which can make it difficult to sell at an expected price. Fraud, hacking, manipulation, and platform or custody failures are additional risks cited by the regulator.

Futures: price exposure without necessarily receiving crypto

A futures contract is a standardized agreement to buy or sell a specified quantity of an underlying asset at a specified price and date. The contract’s terms, rather than an immediate transfer of coins, define the position.

Crypto futures can be cash-settled. In that arrangement, settlement is based on the contract’s terms and price outcome rather than delivery of cryptocurrency. A trader can therefore gain exposure to a price move without needing to receive, store or transfer bitcoin or another token.

Conventional futures have a specified date. Traders who still want exposure as that date approaches may close the position, or move to another contract where their venue and product rules allow. The key point is that dated futures are not simply a spot purchase with a different fee schedule: they are contracts with their own settlement and margin framework.

Perpetual futures, often called perpetuals or perps, take a different approach. They do not have a traditional expiration date. Instead, they use periodic payments between traders holding long and short positions—known as funding—to help keep the contract price aligned with the spot price.

According to Coinbase’s funding-rate explanation, positive funding generally means longs pay shorts, while negative funding generally means shorts pay longs. Funding is therefore a continuing cost or receipt that belongs in the economics of a perpetual position, not a one-off charge that can be ignored after entry.

Margin and leverage: less capital, larger exposure

Futures are commonly traded on margin. Margin is collateral, sometimes described as a performance bond, that represents only a fraction of a contract’s notional value. That lets a trader control a larger position than the collateral posted, which is the source of leverage.

The trade-off is symmetrical in principle but not necessarily in experience: leverage magnifies gains when prices move in the trader’s favour and magnifies losses when they do not. A small change in the underlying cryptocurrency can produce a much larger percentage change relative to the margin committed.

A CME illustration shows why notional value and required margin should be kept separate. On July 7, 2026, CME displayed estimated notional exposure of $6,334 and estimated margin of $1,435 for one Micro Bitcoin futures contract. That is an example of capital efficiency, not a fixed benchmark: CME notes that actual requirements can change and clearing firms may require more.

In practical terms, a trader should first identify the size of the exposure, then the collateral requirement, and then assess how a price move would affect the account. Treating the margin figure as though it were the full economic size of the position obscures the risk being taken.

How a leveraged crypto futures trade can fail

Consider a trader who opens a leveraged long futures position. If the cryptocurrency price rises, the position may gain value. If it falls, losses are calculated against the larger contract exposure, not merely against the intuition that the trader put up a relatively small deposit.

As losses accumulate, the account may no longer meet its margin requirements. The trader may be required to add margin or close the position. Depending on the product and account rules, the CFTC warns that losses can exceed the initial amount deposited.

This is why “I can only lose my margin” is not a safe universal assumption. Product design, account terms and the manner in which a position is closed all matter. Traders should understand their venue’s margin, liquidation and deficit procedures before opening a leveraged trade, rather than assuming every crypto product handles a shortfall in the same way.

Execution conditions can add pressure during fast markets. FINRA notes that volatility and limited liquidity can make it difficult to exit at an expected price. A position that appears manageable at one quoted price may be closed or sold at a less favourable level if available liquidity is limited when the trader needs to act.

Funding, spreads and fees change the cost of a trade

The displayed trading fee is only one part of the cost of trading crypto. Costs can include maker or taker fees, the bid-ask spread, slippage, withdrawal or network fees, and financing or funding costs. Which of these applies depends on the asset, order type, product and platform.

Maker and taker describe how an order interacts with the order book. A maker order adds liquidity by resting in the book; a taker order executes immediately against liquidity that is already available. Coinbase’s fee documentation says fee schedules commonly vary by trading volume and product, so an advertised rate should not be assumed to apply to every account or market.

The spread is the gap between available buy and sell prices. Slippage is the difference between an expected execution price and the price actually achieved. Both can matter more when liquidity is limited or an order is large relative to the available orders at nearby prices.

For a spot buyer moving coins out of a platform, withdrawal and network fees can affect the total cost. For a perpetual futures trader, periodic funding can either add to the cost or create a payment received, depending on the funding direction and the trader’s position. A dated futures position has different contract and settlement considerations, but it is not cost-free simply because it does not use perpetual funding.

Choosing spot or futures for a trading objective

Start with the desired outcome: owning the asset or gaining price exposure. Buying cryptocurrency with the possibility of transferring it to a wallet points to spot trading. Seeking exposure to a rise or fall in price without necessarily receiving the asset points to futures.

The next question is direction. Spot selling generally requires an asset to sell. Futures can support either long exposure, which benefits from a price rise, or short exposure, which benefits from a price fall, under the relevant product and account rules. That flexibility comes with contractual obligations and, commonly, margin risk.

Then consider capital and time horizon. Margin can make futures more capital-efficient than paying the full spot value, but it also increases the sensitivity of the account to adverse price movements. Perpetuals add recurring funding considerations, while dated futures have specified contract dates.

Finally, assess the route into and out of the trade. Spot holders face custody choices if assets are left on a platform or transferred to a wallet. Futures traders need to understand margin requirements and the possibility of forced closure. Across both markets, liquidity, spreads, slippage and platform risks can affect whether a position can be exited at the price a trader expects.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does spot trading mean my crypto is in my personal wallet?

No. Spot trading means buying or selling the underlying cryptocurrency. The asset may remain on the platform or be transferred to a wallet, depending on the platform’s custody and settlement practices and the holder’s actions.

Do crypto futures always result in delivery of bitcoin or other coins?

No. A futures contract is an agreement based on specified terms, and crypto futures may be cash-settled rather than settled through delivery of the cryptocurrency.

What is perpetual futures funding?

Funding is a periodic payment between long and short holders of a perpetual contract intended to help align its price with spot. Positive funding generally has longs paying shorts; negative funding generally reverses that flow.

Can I lose more than the margin I post on a futures trade?

It is possible, depending on the product and account rules. An adverse move can require additional margin or lead to closure of the position, and the initial deposit is not an automatic cap on losses.

Which costs matter besides a platform’s trading fee?

Look at spreads, slippage, withdrawal or network charges, and any financing or funding costs alongside maker or taker fees. The relevant mix differs between a spot purchase, a dated futures contract and a perpetual position.

Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

* This article was originally published here

Ghana Will Require Local Refining of Artisanal Gold From September 1

Ghana’s GoldBod will require Self-Financing Aggregators and their approved offtakers to refine artisanal gold doré in the country before it can be exported, beginning September 1, 2026. The order puts domestic processing at the centre of a gold export stream that reached 104 metric tons in 2025, according to Reuters via Business Day.

Existing offtake agreements must be amended by August 31. GoldBod said noncompliance could result in sanctions, including the suspension or revocation of licences.

Local refining becomes an export condition

The directive covers Self-Financing Aggregators and their approved offtakers—the parties named in GoldBod’s order. From September 1, those parties must have their artisanal gold doré processed in Ghana before export, rather than shipping it in unrefined form.

The timing creates a short transition window for businesses operating under existing offtake arrangements. Agreements in force need to reflect the new local-refining requirement by the day before the mandate takes effect, Reuters reported.

The measure is more than a preference for domestic processing. By warning that licences may be suspended or revoked, GoldBod has tied compliance to continued participation under the applicable GoldBod framework.

Export clearance process

Refining locally is only one part of the export process described by GoldBod. Export applications will be considered after the board confirms that gold has been refined at an approved or designated local refinery, Onua Online reported.

Applicants must also have paid refining charges and completed assay and regulatory requirements. In effect, a refinery confirmation, fees, assays and the required regulatory steps are all prerequisites before GoldBod considers an export application.

The framework leaves GoldBod with a direct verification role at the point of export clearance. The reported rules do not identify how many refineries may be approved or designated, nor do they state that one facility must handle all eligible material. That distinction matters when assessing the capacity needed to support the mandate.

A 104-tonne artisanal-gold export stream

The affected trade is substantial. GoldBod exported 104 metric tons of artisanal gold during 2025 and was on track to match or exceed that volume in 2026, Reuters reported.

Spread evenly over a full year, 104 metric tons equates to an average of roughly two metric tons a week. Actual volumes may not arrive at refineries evenly, but that annual comparison illustrates the scale of material that could require domestic processing once the new export condition starts.

For aggregators and offtakers, the mandate therefore changes the sequence of a large-volume trade: domestic refining, associated payments and testing must now occur before an export request can move forward. The August 31 contract deadline comes immediately before that shift.

Gold Coast Refinery pilot and capacity

Before issuing the export rule, GoldBod agreed with Gold Coast Refinery on a domestic-refining programme. Under the January 20, 2026 agreement, the programme was set to process one metric ton of gold a week, according to the Ghana Gold Board.

Gold Coast Refinery reported capacity of up to two tons weekly. Against GoldBod’s 104 metric tons of artisanal-gold exports in 2025—an average of about two tons weekly—the initial one-tonne programme represents half that average.

The capacity figures are not a measure of the refinery’s actual throughput, and they do not show that Gold Coast Refinery will be the only approved or designated facility under the September rule.

GoldBod said the export flow could meet or surpass 104 metric tons in the relevant year, making the number and operating capacity of eligible local refineries central to implementation.

Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

* This article was originally published here

THORChain 3.20 Unlocks Native Monero and Zcash Swaps With Bitcoin, Ethereum and Stablecoins

Privacy coins have become increasingly difficult to move into the wider crypto market without going through a centralized intermediary. THORChain is looking to change that with one of its most significant protocol upgrades yet.

The decentralized exchange announced the launch of THORChain 3.20, introducing native support for Monero (XMR) and Zcash (ZEC) swaps. Users can now swap the privacy-focused cryptocurrencies against assets including Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and stablecoins directly through THORChain.

The important part is what users do not have to do. No wrapped versions of XMR or ZEC involved, no exchange account is required, and users do not have to deposit their assets with a centralized custodian before making a trade.

That gives privacy-coin holders a more direct route into some of the largest and most liquid parts of the crypto market.

A New Route Out of the Privacy-Coin Silo

The integration is particularly notable for Monero. Access to XMR through centralized exchanges has tightened considerably as trading platforms have removed or restricted the cryptocurrency in response to regulatory and compliance concerns.

That has created an awkward problem for an asset built around financial privacy and user control: holders can transact directly on the Monero network, but moving from XMR into assets such as BTC, ETH or dollar-denominated stablecoins has often required relying on the very centralized services that many crypto users are trying to avoid.

THORChain 3.20 provides another option. Instead of sending XMR or ZEC to an exchange, selling it, and then withdrawing another cryptocurrency, users can exchange the native assets directly through THORChain while maintaining self-custody.

It extends the same basic model THORChain already uses for assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum: connecting otherwise separate blockchain networks without relying on wrapped representations of those assets.

That model becomes particularly relevant with privacy coins because decentralized access to them has historically been much more limited than for assets operating on major smart-contract networks.

More Than a Privacy-Coin Upgrade

Monero and Zcash are the headline additions, but version 3.20 also introduces broader changes to THORChain’s liquidity infrastructure.

The upgrade adds a new Stable Reserve, which introduces stablecoin-to-stablecoin swaps without liquidity fees. For users moving between supported stable assets, the system is intended to provide a more efficient execution path within THORChain.

THORChain has also introduced Protocol-Owned Liquidity (POL), giving the protocol additional mechanisms for deploying its own capital across the network rather than relying entirely on external liquidity providers. Version 3.20 also brings renewed support for Solana, Base and BNB, expanding the range of networks available through the protocol alongside its existing cross-chain infrastructure.

Together, the changes point toward THORChain becoming a broader liquidity layer rather than simply a venue for swapping between a handful of major Layer 1 assets.

Privacy Coins Get a More Direct Connection to Crypto

The larger significance of the release is that two of crypto’s best-known privacy assets are gaining a more direct connection to the rest of the digital-asset market.

Decentralized exchanges are now a fundamental part of crypto trading, but most still operate primarily within individual blockchain ecosystems. Moving native assets between separate networks can require bridges, wrapped tokens or centralized platforms. THORChain was built around removing those steps.

Adding XMR and ZEC extends that model into a part of the market where decentralized access has remained comparatively limited. For privacy-coin holders, THORChain 3.20 therefore represents more than another place to trade. It provides a way to move directly between privacy-focused cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin, Ethereum and stablecoins without surrendering custody of the underlying assets along the way.

Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

* This article was originally published here

Is Bitcoin Forming a Bull Flag? $90K Target Coming Into Play

What could be a bull flag is starting to form at the top of the amazing price surge that took place on Wednesday and into Friday of last week. Should this bull flag be confirmed and a breakout happens, $90K could be the eventual target. 

Bull flag forming?

Source: TradingView

Looking at the short-term time frame chart above, it can be seen that the $BTC price hit a local high of $79,500 before falling back quite sharply to $76,700. Since then the bulls have regrouped, and the pattern that is starting to emerge looks very much like a classic bull flag.

This type of pattern usually has the price going sideways and lower within the confines of a flag structure until there is a breakout, which would normally issue from the top of the pattern.

However, for a bull flag to be confirmed there would typically be at least three touches to the top of the flag, and three to the bottom. As can be noted, the price action is lacking in this requirement so far, although with some more sideways and downward chop the pattern can eventually be completed.

Something else to think about is that since the $BTC price hit that top, the retracement has only taken it back as far as the 0.236 Fibonacci level. This is the shallowest of all the Fibonacci levels, and if the price does bounce from here it would be very bullish indeed. That said, a correction to at least the 0.382 would probably be a more healthy one.

Confluence at $69K

Source: TradingView

Moving up into the daily time frame one can only gaze with awe at the size of the price increase once the $BTC price had arrived at the very end of the junction between the bear and bull market trendlines and had exploded upward.

So what happens now? Does a bull flag continue to take shape, or could the price fall all the way back to $69K, where horizontal support awaits, plus the 0.618 Fibonacci level, and also a potential confirmation of the 200-day simple moving average. This is a lot of confluence, and like a magnet, this could draw the price back down for what would be a very healthy correction.

At the bottom of the chart, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) displays its indicator high up in overbought territory. The height attained here is greater than anything seen since the $BTC price first entered into its 8-month long bull flag in February 2024. One excellent result of this climb, as far as the bulls are concerned, is that the huge downward trend stretching back to November 2024 has potentially now been nullified.

Continuation or healthier pullback?

Source: TradingView

The macro time frame of the weekly shows us how important the current resistance at $78,600 is, and also the next resistance after that at one of the bear market highs at $82,750. Can the $BTC price get through this, or is a longer corrective period needed?

One thing is pretty sure in trading - a price cannot go up at such a pace indefinitely. The time comes when the buyers are exhausted, and that’s when the sellers step in.

It may be that the bull flag does continue to play out and there is a renewal of the upward thrust from Bitcoin. However, that may not be a healthy outcome, and if this happens, the correction, when it does come, could be a lot more violent.

Back to the RSI - in this weekly time frame it can be seen that the indicator line has broken through the downtrend. We need to wait until the end of this week to see if it holds above. If it does, stand by for more upside price action.

Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

* This article was originally published here